On Tues., Oct. 16, the second presidential debate took place on the
Hofstra University campus in Hempstead, N.Y. It will likely be
remembered for the tense confrontation over Libya, when both the
Republican Mitt Romney and the Democrat Barack Obama plainly revealed
what scant admiration they have for one another.
Both men were well aware they could not allow the viewing audience to
perceive from their words or demeanor that they were being dominated by
the other guy. At times that prickly aspect of the hour-and-a-half of
questioning, answering and posturing put the moderator, Candy Crowley,
in a position something like that of a put upon referee for an athletic
competition.
Depending on one’s point of view, Crowley either did a good job with a tough assignment, or the CNN political reporter overstepped her bounds as moderator.
As a 15-round boxing match, roughly with 15 questions, I had it scored
with Obama winning nine rounds, Romney winning three rounds, with three
rounds even.
The instant polls I've seen today found in Obama’s favor, too: Reuters
had it Obama 48 percent, Romney 33 percent; CBS had it Obama 37 percent,
Romney 30 percent; CNN had it Obama 46 percent, Romney 39 percent.
The debate’s noteworthy Libya moment had Romney saying Obama and his
administration waited a couple of weeks to label the killing of
Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans on Tues., Sept. 11,
as a terrorist act.
Obama pounced on the opportunity and corrected Romney. In his defense
Obama pointed to his own comments on the day after the incident: “The
United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and
shocking attack ... no acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of
this great nation."
Nonetheless, Romney challenged the veracity of his opponent and then
Crowley spoke up to say the president was right about what he had said,
even if at the time there was still considerable confusion about actually happened
in Benghazi.
Obama also bristled at Romney’s suggestion that politics somehow had
played into the scenario, and he chastised the former Massachusetts
governor that it was “offensive” for him to make such insinuations.
Romney never explained why it is so important for the White House to
rush to label every act of violence in the world as terrorism, or
something else, before all the facts have been studied.
Both candidates ducked some questions. Both candidates milled around
uncomfortably on their feet. At times the stage didn’t seem big enough
for both of them.
Romney’s best moments were spent talking about the need to create more jobs, energy policy and tax cuts.
Obama’s best moments were spent talking about saving the automobile
industry, equality for women in the workplace and foreign policy.
Complaining about how bad a ref was is what sports fans who are disappointed with the results of a game do. The fans of the winners of the game don't usually have much to say about referees.
No comments:
Post a Comment