Tuesday, April 30, 2024

Five Film Favorites: Newspapers/Periodicals

 by F.T. Rea

Legendary editor Ben Bradlee on the job
at the Washington Post.


This installment of Five Film Favorites offers a special challenge. It touches on two industries I've poured years of my time and toil into – the movie business and periodical publishing. It's also challenging because, from what I can tell, after the field is properly narrowed with some rules, the remaining list of outstanding flicks about newspapering isn't as long as one might expect.

Then again, as with the previous Five Film Favorites columns, the list of mine that follows isn't about declaring what I think are surely the five greatest films in a selected category. Instead, it's about good films that are favorites of mine. My favorites, today. Next week the list could change.

About those rules for this column: “Citizen Kane” (1941) isn't on my list of five this time. Here's why: Rather than focusing on Charles Foster Kane, the publisher or editor, etc., it's really more about Kane, the vain empire-builder, a driven man who must dominate all he surveys. That and the lonely Kane, who has a fetish for collecting objects that catch his eye. Although it has been one of my all-time favorite films since forever, this time around it just doesn't make the cut. Rules.

“The Parallax View” (1974) is well worth watching again. Nonetheless, it's more of a political thriller with a dauntless reporter for a protagonist. It's certainly not a look at the people who put out a newspaper and how they go about doing it. Accordingly, this means a ton of other movies, good and bad, are being ruled out for this list, since they rely too much on cliché-ridden variations of the independent-minded reporter acting like a dogged, badass detective.

So, in addition to being about films with interesting stories to tell about good characters, this list is about appreciating what it takes to assemble the staff, gather the facts, write and edit the copy on deadline, design the pages, sell the ads, run the presses and circulate the newspaper. 

In alphabetical order, here are my five favorite films about newspapers:
  • All the President's Men” (1976): Color. 138 minutes. Directed by Alan J. Pakula. Cast: Robert Redford, Dustin Hoffman, Hal Holbrook, Jason Robards, Jack Warden. Note: In covering a story about unusual burglars getting caught breaking into the Democratic Party's headquarters, which was in the Watergate building, Washington Post reporters Bob Woodward (Redford) and Carl Bernstein (Hoffman) find some loose ends. Following up, they begin an investigative journey that eventually hastens the collapse of the Nixon presidency.
  • Between the Lines” (1977): Color. 101 Minutes. Directed by Joan Micklin Silver. Cast: John Heard, Lindsay Crouse, Jeff Goldblum, Jill Eikenberry, Gwen Welles, Michael J. Pollard. Note: As the 1970s wound down, the alternative periodicals that had thrived in the late-'60s and early-'70s began to go out of style. And, the baby boomer staffers for such publications were getting older. This film reveals some of the challenges they faced and the anxiety they felt, as their time for being carefree and cool 20-somethings was running out.
  • Deadline U.S.A.” (1952): Black and white. 87 minutes. Directed by Richard Brooks. Cast: Humphrey Bogart, Ethel Barrymore, Kim Hunter, Ed Begley, Paul Stevens. Note: Bogart is the embattled editor of a large daily newspaper that's about to be sold off to tabloid-publishing interests expected to pull the plug on it. It's quite interesting to see that some of the same problems large newspapers have struggled with in the last 25 years of decline seem to go back much further than the age of the Internet. This film's noirish style and somewhat corny plot actually holds up pretty well.
  • Newspaperman:The Life and Times of Ben Bradlee” (2017): In this documentary black and white and color still images, as well as movie footage are presented. 90 minutes. Directed by John Maggio. Note: Among those seen and heard (as themselves) are: Ben Bradlee, Carl Bernstein, Bob Woodward, Tom Brokaw, Sally Quinn, Jim Lehrer. Most folks are at least somewhat aware of Bradlee's pivotal role as the editor of the Washington Post during the Watergate scandal (See "All the President's Men"). However, Bradlee's life story, before and after that episode, is well worth knowing more about.
  • Spotlight” (2015): Color. 129 minutes. Directed by Tom McCarthy. Cast: Mark Ruffalo, Michael Keaton, Rachel McAdams, Liev Schreiber, John Slattery, Stanley Tucci. Note: In 2001 investigating the Catholic Church for charges of facilitating the sexual abuse of children, many children – in Boston! – posed quite a problem for the Boston Globe. This view of the methodology of the editors and reporters doing their jobs properly is as good as it gets. The revelation of the powerful forces against them is brutally unsparing.
By the way, another rule I usually apply to movies selected to be on Five Film Favorites lists is that I must have seen the picture more than once. It's a good rule. Accordingly, I re-watched “Spotlight” again, just so I could include it. 

These five movies do a pretty good job of presenting moving pictures of inky newspaper people, on the job, publishing. Always on deadline! Assembling what Washington Post publisher Phil Graham liked to call, “The first rough draft of history.”

-- 30 --

Sunday, April 28, 2024

"Catch and Kill," Indeed

"Catch and kill," indeed. 

Donald J. Trump's trial, the one currently underway in Manhattan, sure is casting a harsh light on the National Enquirer. Well, good. 

It's about time for us to take a good look at the overall damage that's being done by some of the sleazy practices of that periodical, as well as Fox News, and for that matter -- the whole "alternative facts," disinformation industry. 

The National Enquirer and Fox News have been among the most essential of the busy liars-for-hire who have been propping up Trump. Without his team of amoral propagandists amplifying his poor-pitiful-me fundraising messaging his influence shrivels. (Speaking of shriveling, Trump has looked to me like he's been doing just that, lately.)      

Anyway, isn't it high time for our society to question its continuing tolerance of lies everywhere in our midst? Especially lies posing as free speech. Consequently, it's a damn good time to recognize that disinformation is being used like a wrecking ball, to smash the very concept of truth into pieces. 

Of course, Trump, the MAGA boss, is the most prolific and meanspirited liar any of us has ever seen on the USA's political stage. It appears many of his followers get a kick out of his propensity to fling his words about, however his mood dictates. The darker the mood, the better. 

Moreover, with Trump's slicing and dicing of the truth, just as it is with his policies, cruelty is the essential stylistic factor. History tells us that Trump's fascist political forerunners in the 20th century also saw cruelty as an influential style to affect. 

Like Trump, back in their time, they used propaganda as a weapon to wage war on the traditional role that respect for the truth and honesty in dealings had played in holding democratic, rule of law societies together. 

In 2024, rather than hide their assaults on the truth, loyal MAGA cultists prefer to wear their sneering cynicism concerning the actual existence of truth on their chests like a colorful battle ribbon. 

For MAGA agents, the ribbon for a successful episode of "catch and kill," is much coveted, indeed. 

-- 30 --

Saturday, April 20, 2024

Remembering Roy Scherer on April 20th

Roy B. Scherer
(circa 2006)
Rory B. Scherer (1942-2023) was a man I knew and respected for over 50 years. According to Roy's wife, Sally Camp, he died peacefully last year, on December 8th. 

To be sure, Roy was a one-of-a-kind marvel. His many years of contributing to society in a positive way, as a friend indeed and a ready activist, are now rightfully seen as aspects of a remarkable legacy. 

Over our decades of friendship, Roy and I shared many a laugh. His Libertarian political philosophy and his keen sense of social justice were always at the heart of his dogged activism.

Longtime Virginia politicians, as well as veteran political reporters, were all familiar with Roy (pictured right, my photo) and his opinions, especially those opinions having to do with the legalization of marijuana. As he was Virginia's original registered lobbyist dedicated to that issue, it is particularly appropriate to remember Roy -- now, with a legal smile -- on April 20th. 

However, his activism touched other issues having to do with anyone's Constitutional rights. Whether or not I agreed with him on a particular issue, I knew Roy to be a thoughtful man. Moreover, he was a kind man whose consistent beliefs seemed to flow from his life experience. That, rather than some canned, party line sort of thinking.

Thus, it is totally fitting that the Commonwealth's Senate has remembered Roy with the following resolution: 
SENATE RESOLUTION NO. 126 
Offered March 4, 2024

WHEREAS, Roy Britton Scherer, a passionate advocate for the legalization of marijuana and a beloved husband and friend to many in the Richmond community, died on December 8, 2023; and

WHEREAS, Roy Scherer was born in Richmond, attended military schools in his youth, and ultimately graduated from the Miller School of Albemarle; and

WHEREAS, Roy Scherer served the nation as a member of the United States Air Force, then volunteered with numerous organizations in the pursuit of social justice and civil rights; and

WHEREAS, Roy Scherer formed Virginians for the Study of Marijuana Laws and was at the forefront of advocacy for the legalization of marijuana in the Commonwealth; and

WHEREAS, from 1985 to the time of his passing, Roy Scherer worked for Virginians Against Drug Violence, cultivating strong working relationships with government agencies, nonprofit organizations, and stakeholders; and

WHEREAS, Roy Scherer impressed colleagues and state officials alike with his expertise, analytical mind, unwavering convictions, and persistence; and

WHEREAS, Roy Scherer was a longtime member and volunteer of the Libertarian Party of Virginia, and a fixture of the Richmond community who touched countless lives through his kindness and generosity; and

WHEREAS, Roy Scherer will be fondly remembered and greatly missed by his wife of 20 years, Sally; and numerous other family members and friends; now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED, That the Senate of Virginia hereby note with great sadness the loss of Roy Britton Scherer; and, be it

RESOLVED FURTHER, That the Clerk of the Senate prepare a copy of this resolution for presentation to the family of Roy Britton Scherer as an expression of the Senate of Virginia’s respect for his memory.
*
Note: On May 11, 2024, commencing at 2 p.m., a Celebration of Roy Scherer's life party will take place at 529 High Street in Petersburg. For more information about this event click on this Facebook link

RIP, Roy Scherer.  

-- 30 -- 

Thursday, April 18, 2024

Trump's Jailed Martyr Ploy

Hey now, reports out of Manhattan are saying, the judge thinks they have a jury seated for the Trump election-tampering case. Still, the reader may wonder, what about the damn trampled on gag order?

OK, it looks to me like Trump actually wants to spend a night, or two, a week at the most, in the hoosegow. Some safe form of jail. Let's say it's like being grounded in the special X-Presidents' Suite, perhaps somewhere in the courthouse ... with no telephone.

At this point, I expect data from a focus group has suggested to the Trump camp that the spectacle of jailing Trump, with him gushing perp-walk trash-talk, will goose the craziest elements of his base to take action, ASAP. Your guess is as good as mine what that might mean.

This Jailed Martyr Ploy episode, or something like it, would be a-made-to-order kick-off for Trump's election year campaign using anger and fear to motivate and direct his Brownshirt cells. Maybe to be totally Trumpy -- the shirt color should be goldenrod.

-- 30 --

Wednesday, April 17, 2024

Those Missing Briley Cards

Note: In June of 1984, Richmonders experienced an abrupt change in the way mainstream news was gathered and presented. A monster jailbreak story caused that to happen. Because of that change, I stumbled onto an offbeat gimmick in the world of self-publishing. This piece about that episode was first written in 1988 for publication in SLANT. For the online realm, I rewrote it in 2005. 

Today, I have mixed feeling about this story. Maybe the best thing I can say about it is that I ended up learning more than I bargained for. It certainly proved to me, once again, that regardless of the artist's intentions, viewers tend to decide for themselves what it means to them ... as I suppose they should.   

*
Having terrorized the town with a series of grisly murders five years before, on May 31, 1984, brothers Linwood and James Briley led what was then the largest death-row jailbreak in U.S. history. In all, six condemned men flew the coop by overpowering prison guards, donning the guards’ uniforms and creating a bogus bomb-scare to bamboozle their way out of Virginia’s supposedly escape-proof Mecklenburg Correctional Center.

While their four accomplices were rounded up quickly, the brothers Briley remained at large for 19 days. The FBI captured the duo at a picnic adjacent to the garage where they had found work in Philadelphia.

Linwood Briley was subsequently electrocuted in Richmond on Oct. 12, 1984; likewise, James Briley on Apr. 18, 1985.

While the Brileys were on the run the volume and intensity of the media coverage, both local and national, was unprecedented. During that manhunt the Brileys-mania that surrounded it led to stories about them being spotted, simultaneously, in various locations on the East Coast from North Carolina to Canada. 

My sense of it then was the depraved were being transformed into celebrities, so newspapers and television stations could sell lots of ads. Once they were on the lam, if it came to making a buck, it didn’t seem to matter anymore what the Brileys had done to be on death row. When I noticed kids in the Carytown area were playing chasing games and pretending to be the Brileys, well, that was just too damn much for me.

“OK,” I said to a familiar Power Corner Happy Hour group in the Texas-Wisconsin Border Cafe, “if the Briley brothers can be made into heroes, to sell tires and sofas on TV, how long will it be before they're on collectable cards, like baseball cards? (or words to that effect).” To illustrate my point I grabbed a couple of those Border logo-imprinted cardboard coasters from the bar and sketched quick examples on the backs, which got laughs.


Later at home, I sat at my ancient drawing table (which I still have) and designed the series of cards. The next  day I did the inking. To avoid race humor entirely, I used a simple drawing style that assigned no race to the characters. The sense of humor employed was sardonic and droll. I decided to run off a hundred sets of eight cards each, which were put into small transparent plastic bags, with a piece of bubble gum included -- for audacity's sake. As a test, I figured to sell them for $1.50 per set and see just what would happen.

Traveling around to Fan District bars on my bicycle, it took about three days to sell out the first press-run from my olive drab backpack. New cards were designed, to expand the set to 14 cards. More sets were printed, more plastic bags, more bubble gum. 

A half-dozen locations began selling “The Brileys” on a consignment basis. Sales were boosted when the local press began doing stories on them. For about a week I was much-interviewed by local reporters and orders to buy card sets began coming in the mail from as far away as France. 

Reporters started calling me for easy quotes, to fill articles on death penalty issues. That I was opposed to the death penalty seemed to strike some of them as odd. Finding myself in a position to goose a story that was lampooning the overkill presentation of the same press corps that was interviewing me was fun. At first. 

In the midst of a TV interview, I announced that T-shirts commemorating the Brileys' 1984 Summer Tour were on the way. Yes, with T-shirts I was crossing a line, but I didn't see that then.

*

Apart from my political cartoon on cards, the hated Briley brothers’ chilling crime spree and subsequent escape inspired all sorts of lowbrow jokes, sick songs, and you-name-it, some of which did indeed fan the flames of racial hate in Virginia. Naively, I felt no connection to that scene. 

At least, not until a stop at the silk screen printer’s plant suddenly began to cast a new light on my fly-by-night popular culture project. Walking from the offices to the loading dock meant passing through a warehouse full of cardboard boxes, stacked to the ceiling. Suddenly, I was surrounded: Four or five young men closed in and cornered me.

Some of them, if not all, had box cutters in their hands; all of them were definitely Black. At that moment I felt Whiter than Ross Mackenzie (then the editorial page editor of the Richmond News Leader). Tension filled the air when their spokesman asked if I was the man behind those cards and T-shirts.

As it was not the first time I’d been subjected to questions about the cards, I promptly asked if any of them had seen the cards. Or, had they only heard about them? 

As I suspected, they hadn’t seen them. Luckily, I had a pack in my shirt pocket, which I took out and handed to the group’s leader. 

As he studied them, one by one, his cohorts looked over his shoulder. I carefully explained what my original motivation had been in creating the cartoons. No one laughed but the threatening spell was soon broken. I let them keep the cards.


Later on, I was in a drug store, restocking one of my dealers for the cards, when a White lady with blue hair approached me. She worked there and had seen the cards, which she found unfunny. 

The woman told me her husband was on the crew that had cleaned up the crime scenes after some of the murders. Then she said that if I was going to profit from it, I should be man enough to hear her out.

So, I did. She gave me specific details. It was mostly stuff I had known, or suspected, but the way she told it was brutal.

At this point the success of my absurd art project seemed to be turning sour. Then I got a call from a reporter asking me what I had to say about Linwood Briley having made some disparaging remarks about my cards. Well, I got peeved and asked the scribe what the hell anybody ought to care about what such a man has to say.

Like it or not, I had become a part of what I had been mocking in the first place, which I mentioned in an interview with a Washington Post reporter writing about the phenomenon.
Rea says he designed the cards to deflate what he saw as the growing mythology of the Brileys, and to lampoon what he viewed as excessive media attention to their exploits. "The cards are deliberately provocative," he said. "I sensed that the Brileys, because of their derring-do, were becoming heroes. People wanted to know everything about them. We had two to three articles in the paper every day down here."

Rea drew the first cartoons for friends. When they found them amusing, he decided to market them at $1.50 a pack. "I'm a little uncomfortable that I'm becoming a part of the point I'm making," he said.

So I decided to withdraw the cards and T-shirts from the market. Today, without the context of the 1984 news stories being fresh, the humor aspect of the cards is somewhat arcane now. All the images were based on details from the aforementioned over-reported stories.

*

About three years later, I was having a beer in the Bamboo Cafe, standing at the bar at Happy Hour talking with friends. A middle-aged man who I didn’t know stepped my way. Furtively, he asked if I was the guy who “drew those Briley cards.”

After I said, “yes,” and introduced myself, he asked me a few frequently asked questions about the cards. Then he spoke in a hushed tone, saying something like, “What about those missing cards?”

“Missing cards?” I returned, feeling uncomfortable. “Are you asking why I skipped some numbers?

He nodded and reached in his shirt pocket to pull out a full set of The Brileys, with the cards still in the original plastic bag. Wanting to end the conversation quickly -- that he had the cards with him was way too strange for me -- I told him the simple truth with no jokes: “OK. First, I wanted to imply there was a vast series out there, without having to create it. Then, I wanted the viewer to maybe imagine for himself what the other cards might be.”

The collector put the cards back in his pocket. He stepped away, obviously disappointed with my easy answer, which gave him no dripping red meat to savor. As I remember it, he just walked away and didn't say anything else. 

That was fine with me.
 
Bottom line: Sometimes, like that night in the Bamboo, it seems the plain truth is of little use to inquiring minds. Which, is always a good lesson to learn, again. 

-- 30 --

Saturday, April 13, 2024

What Did Not Happen

When there’s a tragedy, to do with a school shooting, sometimes memories of my own high school days pop up. In the mid-‘60s, in my crowd, we were so reckless with drinking, fist-fighting and driving our cars like fools, it’s hard to believe more of us didn’t meet the Grim Reaper in those days. 

Still, it was a safer time in some ways, in that dangerous drugs and lethal weapons were not yet on the list of risks my baby boomer age group routinely faced in its teenage years. Whatever street drug consumption was going on around Thomas Jefferson High School, when I was there in the mid-'60s was not on my radar. 

The first time I was offered marijuana was shortly after high school. That first time I turned it down...

By the time my daughter, Katey, was in high school two decades later, the culture had changed quite a bit. By then exotic fire arms and a 
potpourri of mind-bending drugs had become widely available, surely available to anyone with much of a desire to possess them, including kids. 

Speaking of attractive dangers for kids, one particular episode from my daughter’s high school years stands out as a time when something awful could have happened ... but didn't. 

The set up for a tragedy was certainly present. However, this time good luck prevailed.

Katey went to Open High, then situated at 00 Clay Street, in Richmond's Jackson Ward. At Open the students were encouraged to take a wide range of classes held in various locations. Some of those classes were taught by lay teachers. 

Please note: As Katey received a good education at Open, the reader should not take it that any put-down of the school, itself, is intended with the telling of this story.

Anyway, a few blocks from the school’s downtown headquarters, there was a large, rather run down, warehouse-like building that was being rented out by-the-room as cheap housing, art studio space, and whatnot…

At this time, I was still somewhat plugged into the mid-town, artsy night life scene in town. So when colorful stories emanating from 
parties that had taken place in the aforementioned building began to circulate, they easily found their way to my ear. In that process, I found that my 15-year-old daughter had been seen at one of those parties. 

When I inquired discreetly to learn more about the situation, my attention was soon drawn to a particular group that had been congregating in one of the building’s larger rooms. Apparently, the group saw themselves as members of a “philosophy club.” The club was headed up by a big-haired character who drove a cab. He also had a gig teaching an elective philosophy class at Open High. And, the class met regularly in the leader’s pad in the aforementioned building. 

From what I could gather, his place had become something of an anytime hangout for a certain group of precocious teenagers. To learn more, I went to see the principal of Open, ostensibly to ask her some questions about me teaching a film-appreciation class there. 

During our conversation, I inquired casually about the aforementioned philosophy class. Immediately, she became agitated. She asked me what I knew about that particular building and the so-called "philosophy club."

At that point I held back what I had heard. Instead, I asked her how much she knew about the club’s leader/teacher.

The worrisome details of what she blurted out next were similar to what I had been told. When I then confirmed that I had heard similar rumors the principal got more upset. She fretfully confided that she had already decided, earlier that day, to pull the plug on the edgy philosophy class.

While that was good news to me, I had to assume that move
 wouldn’t necessarily stop the most adventurous kids from continuing to hang out in that crumbling fortress, behind its locked doors. Which might include Katey. 

So I decided I needed to pay a call on the self-styled pedagogue, holed up in his command post. However, it turned out that simple task proved harder than it should have been. In two or three tries, no one answered my knock on the entrance door. 

Consequently, I left off a short message saying that I wanted to write an article about the club’s good work with alienated teenagers. The guy went for it and called me on the telephone. We set up a time for me to interview him.

First thing, the philosopher-in-chief gave me a tour of the huge, dungeon-like space. It had been years since I been inside that particular building; it struck me as worse looking than I had imagined. My tour guide assured me that most of the parents of the full members and novices were quite happy with him. He claimed they generally had faith that with his lessons he was truly connecting, in a positive way, with their hard-to-reach children. 

Meanwhile, I wondered how many of those parents had actually been inside the building, but I didn't want to tip my hand too soon. Yes, the youngsters partied sometimes, he admitted with a twisted smile. But it was all happening under his enlightened supervision. 

Furthermore, as part of their initiation into the club, the novices were also learning the value of hard work by gradually hauling off tons of the building’s ambient rubble. He boasted that the Libertarian in him then bartered their labor with the landlord, to pay his rent. 

His rent! 

That way he could channel more of the money the members raised, through their various projects, into video equipment and other such "philosophical" tools. By the time we got back to his desk, I had seen plenty and heard enough. Beyond that, no matter how alarmed, or not, one might have been about his convenient sense of morality, the dilapidated building itself, really was scary as all get-out.

In the guru’s point of view, it appeared he saw nothing intrinsically wrong with a creepy middle-aged man facilitating the corruption of 15-year-olds, all under the banner of legit schooling. 

Sensing the time was right, I interrupted his self-serving presentation. Abruptly, my tone changed. 

Borrowing from the hours of gangster movie footage I absorbed during my days as manager of the Biograph Theatre, I narrowed my eyes at the startled man, perhaps the way Humphrey Bogart or Robert Mitchem might look at a double-crosser. 

Standing up from my chair I explained to him that I wasn’t there to bring him trouble over whatever illegal shenanigans had already gone on in there. What I was there to say was that I did not want MY daughter in THAT building again. 

Without raising my voice, I said from that moment on, I would hold him -- "personally" -- accountable. Yes, he probably felt that the threat of bodily harm had just been implied. 

Satisfied that the speechless philosopher had gotten the message, I left directly. I certainly didn't want to stretch my tough guy impersonation too thin.

Later that day, I met with Katey to tell her about my visit to the warehouse. In so many words, I said I now had good reason to believe the philosophy club’s professor was a garden-variety child molester -- a sicko who was using access to drugs and the building’s tomb-like privacy to lure children away from all scrutiny.

While Katey objected to a few of my characterizations and interpretations, she couldn’t deny that some of it was probably accurate. Moreover, she was absolutely forbidden to go in the place again. Of course, I knew she could do as she pleased, so I hoped for the best.

Subsequently, when the warehouse fakir told his followers that Katey Rea must be kept out, well, some members took it to mean she was a squealer. That became a bigger problem when the school’s principal called the cops days later, to investigate the whole mess.

Because I had been spotted by club members, when I paid my courtesy call on their leader, they jumped to the conclusion that Katey’s father was the whistle-blower; she was blamed for their trouble. Which was mostly a bum rap, because we hadn't discussed it until after my visit to the philosopher's den, but the "squealer" label stuck for a while.

It wasn’t much longer before the philosophy club, itself, was 86ed from the warehouse. The cab-driver faded away. 

In the short run, Katey paid a bitter price for the clumsy moves her father made in his effort to protect her. She endured being ostracized from the cool kids group for a while. Not easy for a 15-year-old.

Still, we were all lucky. Some of those kids may have learned a lesson the hard way, but there were no funerals I know of. Katey learned firsthand something about the vagaries of in-crowd cliques. 

When this episode was unfolding, I was improvising. Doing what my instincts told me was right. But since it did cause Katey some trouble, I worried for a good while that I probably should have handled it differently. 

No doubt, some parents would have done nothing and hoped for the best. Others would have called the cops. Still others would have tried to be the boss and immediately changed their daughter's school. Knowing that any strategy I tried to impose on the situation could backfire, I followed my instincts to take decisive action, by moving  directly toward the source of the problem. 

Bottom line: OK, this piece mostly circles around imagining what bad things did not happen. Looking back on this story, I still think the solution wasn't worse than the problem was. 

I hope so.   

-- 30 --

Wednesday, April 03, 2024

Trump's Newfound Religiosity

Why has Donald Trump recently decided to become an unabashed, self-styled religious figure?

Well, to start with, that's where the believers can be found. Which means:

1. That's where the money is. Picture this: If Trump can get a coast-to-coast bunch of churchgoing Christians to peel off just half of what they're accustomed to donating to their church, and send it to him, on a weekly or monthly basis, that maneuver has the potential to be quite lucrative.

Although everybody knows Trump really, really wants/needs to be president, again, he has longed to have a never-ending fountain of money, in the worst way, for all of his life. It's possible Trump wants that fountain more than he wants back in the White House.

2. That's where the suckers are. If Trump thinks heroic WWII soldiers who were killed in battle in Europe were "suckers," just imagine what he thinks of the gullibility of people who have unflinching faith in Mother Mary's immaculate conception theory of how she became pregnant; what he thinks of the gullibility of people who believe that Jesus walked on water and that he died on the cross, then miraculously came back to life on Easter Sunday. Trump must figure he can convince a lot of those believers of almost any damn thing.

3. That's where the new voters are. Trump knows he needs new voters to replace some he has lost for various reasons. Death among them. But still, a certain small percentage of his supporters won't love his new religiosity strategy. So he especially wants to gather up millions of the young and baptized who are naïve enough, say, to purchase one of his Trump Bibles for only $59.99.

4. That's where the angry fools are. Trump needs to recruit a new army of crazies to do dirty work like his January 6th army did when called upon. So, as the year goes on, he needs a million angry fools who will sling violence at various assigned targets, on cue. Then, if caught, bank completely on receiving a presidential pardon.

5. Trump wants to fall back on being the one and only Godfather of the First Church of Trump, when he loses in November. Naturally, rather than situated at Mar-a-Lago, its palace/resort/headquarters will be at a beautiful offshore location yet to be determined.

Dear reader, I think you probably get my drift, so I won't go on stretching my point about Trump's new angle. Last thought: Never forget that in 2017 Trump, the wannabe fascist dictator, told us all just exactly where he still wants to take the country. Concerning the deadly riot in Charlottesville, Trump declared: "I think there is blame on both sides ... but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides."

*

-- Words and art by F.T. Rea.

-- 30 --